What are the consequences in terms of benefits and losses, to the do we do with adoption of a specific criminal policy of criminalization of prostitution? The answer to this question is as complex as the phenomenon of prostitution itself (street, local or online; voluntary or; low-level or luxury…). It refers, first of all, to an analysis of the different existing models of legislative approach to the issue, and to the examination of which of them are at a stigmatization and criminalization of this activity.
The models of normative treatment
Of prostitution that have been throughout history can be, with variations, to four: regulationism, abolitionism, prohibitionism and regulationism. Regulationism has been in Europe since the mid-19th century and blames the prostitute Email List for promoting a market for the purchase and sale of sex, defining prostitution as an inevitable evil that must be in any case. Under its protection, regulations “in favour of the common good” arise, to protect public order and health, establishing limited spaces for the development of the activity and health controls and permanent identification of prostitutes.
The abolitionists, for their part
Would later respond to this stigmatisation, blame-shifting and confinement of the prostitute, denouncing the inadequacies of regulation and advocating a new world without prostitution. The “blame” for the existence of the activity is here transferred from the prostitute to the men, who, with their demand for sexual services, are the ones who provoke the supply and the boom of the business. Abolitionism bases its ideology on the defence of the dignity of women and on the perception of their situation as sex slaves. For this reason, it was originally as a movement to liberate slaves from the white slave trade.
Prohibitionism shares with regulationism the blame Malaysia Email List on prostitutes for the existence of the sex business, and with abolitionism the objective of ending prostitution. But unlike the latter, which aims to achieve its purpose by criminalizing the conduct of those who in some way benefit from the exercise of this activity by prostitutes, prohibitionism identifies the prostitutes themselves as offenders, and leads to the prohibition of prostitution on the street and also in establishments. Thus, it ends up criminalizing both the exercise of prostitution and the conduct out in its environment, even penalizing the conduct of the prostitute.